Bryan Brulotte: War with Iran is a necessary risk

Share this Story : National Post Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr

Bryan Brulotte: War with Iran is a necessary risk

The benefits of preventing a hostile regime from crossing the nuclear threshold and destabilizing the international order outweigh the risks

You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.

War clarifies intentions and strips away illusion. The war between Iran and the West is no longer being fought in the shadows through proxies and covert disruption. The joint American and Israeli campaign is now targeting military infrastructure, command networks, nuclear facilities and senior leadership figures within the Islamic Republic.

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.

Unlimited online access to National Post.

National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.

Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.

Support local journalism.

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.

Unlimited online access to National Post.

National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.

Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.

Support local journalism.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Access articles from across Canada with one account.

Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.

Enjoy additional articles per month.

Get email updates from your favourite authors.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Access articles from across Canada with one account

Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments

Enjoy additional articles per month

Get email updates from your favourite authors

Sign In or Create an Account

Predictably, critics are asking whether such strikes risk destabilizing Iran. They worry about chaos, fragmentation and the absence of a clear “day after” plan. But that question rests on a flawed assumption: it presumes that the status quo was stable.

Bryan Brulotte: War with Iran is a necessary risk Back to video

In reality, the Iranian regime has spent decades exporting instability throughout the Middle East through its proxy militias and nuclear brinkmanship. Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza, militia networks in Iraq and Syria and Houthi forces in Yemen are not spontaneous movements. They are instruments of state power co-ordinated through Tehran’s security apparatus.

This newsletter tackles hot topics with boldness, verve and wit. (Subscriber-exclusive edition on Fridays)

There was an error, please provide a valid email address.

By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.

The next issue of Platformed will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

Interested in more newsletters? Browse here.

In such circumstances, leaving the regime intact would allow it to steadily expand its nuclear capabilities and proxy reach. Disrupting it, on the other hand, could neutralize a threat before the cost of reversal becomes prohibitive. No serious strategist imagines that risk can be eliminated. It can only be redistributed.

That is why it is important to separate rhetoric from operational reality. Public statements about regime change may capture attention, but strategy is revealed by actions. The current campaign is not characterized by large-scale mobilization for territorial occupation or political reconstruction.

It is characterized by targeted strikes against leadership nodes, military infrastructure and nuclear assets. That pattern suggests a narrower objective: degrade capabilities, disrupt co-ordination and restore deterrence. Within that framework, three plausible outcomes present themselves.

The first and most probable is regime continuity under intensified securitization. The Islamic Republic has survived sanctions, internal unrest, targeted killings and economic isolation for decades. Its resilience rests not simply on clerical authority but on the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, an institution that functions simultaneously as a military force, intelligence service and economic power centre.

Jesse Kline: How Iran triggered a world war for its own destruction

Avi Benlolo: The UN has shamefully legitimized Islamic regime's terrorism

Advertisement 1Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.document.addEventListener(`DOMContentLoaded`,function(){let template=document.getElementById(`oop-ad-template`);if(template&&!template.dataset.adInjected){let clone=template.content.cloneNode(!0);template.replaceWith(clone),template.parentElement&&(template.parentElement.dataset.adInjected=`true`)}});

External attacks can consolidate such systems rather than fracture them. National identity fuses with regime preservation. Emergency powers expand. Dissent becomes indistinguishable from disloyalty.

If the security apparatus remains cohesive, Tehran will likely emerge damaged but intact and even more hostile toward the United States and Israel. In that scenario, Iranian retaliation would continue through calibrated escalation.

Missiles, drones and proxy operations impose costs without triggering overwhelming retaliation. Maritime pressure in the Strait of Hormuz would become a lever of economic coercion. Survival, not victory, would be the strategic objective.

U.S. border agents searching electronic devices is way up. Smartwatches, SIM cards and flash drives added to the list Canada

U.S. border agents searching electronic devices is way up. Smartwatches, SIM cards and flash drives added to the list

Canadian mother of four dies after cosmetic surgery in Turkey Canada

Canadian mother of four dies after cosmetic surgery in Turkey

Advertisement 2Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.document.addEventListener(`DOMContentLoaded`,function(){let template=document.getElementById(`oop-ad-template`);if(template&&!template.dataset.adInjected){let clone=template.content.cloneNode(!0);template.replaceWith(clone),template.parentElement&&(template.parentElement.dataset.adInjected=`true`)}});

Your private property may not be safe from Aboriginal-title court cases: Full Comment podcast NP Comment

Your private property may not be safe from Aboriginal-title court cases: Full Comment podcast

Opposition leaders blast Carney's absence from Iran war debate Canadian Politics

Opposition leaders blast Carney's absence from Iran war debate

Nobody wants to say the M-word ahead of this crucial Quebec byelection next month Canadian Politics

Nobody wants to say the M-word ahead of this crucial Quebec byelection next month

The second possibility is internal fragmentation leading to prolonged instability. Authoritarian systems rarely collapse because of protest alone. They fracture when elite cohesion breaks. Leadership decapitation, economic shock or competition within the Revolutionary Guard could trigger internal rivalries that weaken central control.

Such instability would likely manifest as armed unrest in major cities, regional assertiveness among minority populations and competing security services claiming legitimacy.

A fractured Iran would not necessarily be peaceful. In the short term, it could be more volatile and unpredictable. Refugee flows would strain neighbouring states. Energy markets would remain unsettled. External actors would manoeuvre for influence in the vacuum. Yet internal disorder may also constrain the regime’s capacity for sustained external aggression by diverting attention and resources inward.

The third outcome, which is often discussed but the least probable, is the emergence of a strongman who’s prepared to recalibrate relations with the West. Crisis can produce concentrated authority. But ideological realignment rarely follows automatically.

Even a pragmatic leader would likely seek sanctions relief and tactical de-escalation rather than strategic alignment with Washington. Hostility toward the United States is embedded in decades of political identity in Iran. Pressure alone will not erase it.

None of this negates the strategic logic of acting now. A regime approaching the nuclear threshold while projecting power through layered proxy networks presents an accumulating risk. Delay does not preserve stability. It allows adversarial capabilities to mature. Over time, infrastructure hardens, air defences improve and the cost of reversal rises.

For Canada, the implications are not abstract. Our interests align with preventing a hostile regime from crossing the nuclear threshold and destabilizing the broader international order. Canada should stand firmly with its allies while preparing soberly for the economic and security spillovers that may follow. In this regard, Prime Minister Mark Carney’s recent public statements have seemed disjointed and  contradictory.

War changes balances of power. It does not quickly transform political culture. The months ahead will determine whether this campaign successfully constrains Iran’s ability to export instability or merely reshapes the risks it presents. The task now is to show resolve without illusion.

Share this Story : National Post Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.

Hot sleeper? These are the cooling sheets worth buying Sheets from Hush, Endy, Anthropologie and more 14 hours ago Sleep

Hot sleeper? These are the cooling sheets worth buying

Sheets from Hush, Endy, Anthropologie and more

Made-in-Canada skincare supports skin at every stage of life 'I’ve never been interested in masking aging or chasing youth,' says Graydon Skincare founder 15 hours ago Life

Made-in-Canada skincare supports skin at every stage of life

'I’ve never been interested in masking aging or chasing youth,' says Graydon Skincare founder

B.C.'s thrilling new lookout to be Canada's first sky-high glass cube experience Suspended hundreds of metres above sea level, the attraction will offer panoramic views of Vancouver Island 16 hours ago Travel

B.C.'s thrilling new lookout to be Canada's first sky-high glass cube experience

Suspended hundreds of metres above sea level, the attraction will offer panoramic views of Vancouver Island

Advertisement 3Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.document.addEventListener(`DOMContentLoaded`,function(){let template=document.getElementById(`oop-ad-template`);if(template&&!template.dataset.adInjected){let clone=template.content.cloneNode(!0);template.replaceWith(clone),template.parentElement&&(template.parentElement.dataset.adInjected=`true`)}});

Best standup comedy shows in Canada near you this week Darcy & Jer, Michelle Buteau and Jimmy Carr are on sale now 16 hours ago Entertainment

Best standup comedy shows in Canada near you this week

Darcy & Jer, Michelle Buteau and Jimmy Carr are on sale now

Canadian Gen Z skiers can now get an Epic Pass for much less Vail Resorts is cutting the cost of its pass for young skiers and snowboarders ahead of the 2026-2027 season 16 hours ago Travel

Canadian Gen Z skiers can now get an Epic Pass for much less

Vail Resorts is cutting the cost of its pass for young skiers and snowboarders ahead of the 2026-2027 season


© National Post