In international politics, the most important transformations do not always occur in the text of agreements. Sometimes the real transformation lies in the words that suddenly disappear; in red lines that gradually fade; and in silences that carry more meaning than any statement. The possible agreement between Tehran and Washington is precisely of this kind. No official document has yet been released, no final agreement has yet been signed, and even its details remain unclear. Yet the very language used by the American side, along with the political coordinates of the talks, suggests that the matter goes beyond a tactical understanding or a temporary ceasefire. What is now taking shape is the reflection of a gradual shift in America’s understanding of the real balance of power in the Middle East—a change that reveals itself not in press conferences, but in shifting priorities and a quiet retreat from certain maximalist objectives.

Donald Trump is speaking of a “peace memorandum” with Iran at a time when, unlike in previous years, there is almost no serious or direct reference to the total destruction of Iran’s nuclear program, the elimination of its enrichment capacity, or the dismantling of the main components of Tehran’s deterrence. This absence is not accidental.

In reality, what is happening in Washington today is not an ideological change in its view of the Islamic Republic, but rather a pragmatic reassessment of the costs of continuing the status quo.

In reality, what is happening in Washington today is not an ideological change in its view of the Islamic Republic, but rather a pragmatic reassessment of the costs of continuing the status quo.

After years of sanctions, maximum pressure, proxy wars, security operations, and attempts to wear Iran down on all fronts, the United States has now reached a point where the continuation of chronic tension in the Persian Gulf, instead of producing geopolitical advantage, is becoming a permanent drain on America itself.

READ: Trump links Iran negotiations to expansion of Abraham Accords

This issue has become more tangible for Washington than ever, especially after successive crises in energy markets, maritime insecurity, threats to the Strait of Hormuz, and the rising costs of indirect conflict in the region. The United States is now facing a difficult reality: amid intense competition with China, a global economic crisis, domestic divisions, and pressure from public opinion, it no longer has the capacity to enter another major, grinding........

© Middle East Monitor