The most durable political crimes are not announced. They are administered—quietly—through protocol, wrapped in adult nouns like ‘restraint,’ ‘responsibility,’ ‘national interest.’ By the time outrage arrives, it is already being audited for tone and reminded to behave.

Gaza is not merely the site of mass death. It is a stress test for political systems: a measure of who still believes there are moral limits, and who has redesigned governance so extermination becomes an externality—tragic, regrettable, and above all, inconvenient.

Pakistan’s ruling establishment did not wake up and decide to “support Israel.” That would have required candour. Instead, it perfected something more contemporary: alignment without recognition, participation without signatures, collaboration without the embarrassment of saying the word. A politics of compatibility.

This is not hypocrisy. Hypocrisy still implies a standard you are failing. This is architecture.

Modern empire no longer relies on declarations. It relies on supply chains, vetoes, diplomatic atmospherics, and the careful outsourcing of moral liability. It does not say “we conquered;” it says “we stabilized.” It does not say “we starved;” it says “we managed humanitarian access.” It does not say “collective punishment;” it says “security environment.”

Gaza is administered in this grammar. Israel performs the violence. Washington supplies weapons, cover, and the procedural scaffolding that keeps outrage from becoming consequence. Regional partners normalise the fallout. Other states—Pakistan among them—adjust their posture so nothing jams the machinery. No endorsement required. Only compatibility with the operating system.

Empire prefers subcontractors: allies who absorb reputational risk, do the dirty work, or—more elegantly—do nothing with disciplined consistency. Not all collaborators wear uniforms. Some wear adjectives.

READ: Pakistan, the Gulf, and the high cost of Zionist........

© Middle East Monitor