Iran’s missile strike near Israel’s Dimona nuclear facility on Saturday night was more than a dramatic escalation in the shadow war between the two nations. It was a reminder of the fragility of Israel’s decades-long policy of “nuclear ambiguity,” a strategy designed to keep adversaries guessing about the country’s ultimate deterrent while avoiding direct confrontation with allies who have long opposed nuclear proliferation.

The missiles landed just 14 kilometres from the reactor, damaging nearby buildings and injuring at least 20 people. The facility itself was untouched, but the symbolism was unmistakable: Iran had demonstrated its ability to reach Israel’s most sensitive site, despite Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s declaration only a day earlier that Iran’s missile capabilities had been “destroyed.”

A Retaliation With Symbolic Weight

The strike was retaliation for Israeli-American attacks on Iran’s Natanz nuclear enrichment facility only a day earlier. Tehran’s Aerospace Force commander, Majid Musawi warned of “upcoming surprises,” framing the attack as an “eye or an eye.” The message was clear: Iran could threaten Israel’s nuclear infrastructure, even if it stopped short of hitting the reactor itself. For Israel, the incident is a nightmare scenario. Dimona has long been the centrepiece of its nuclear program, shrouded in secrecy since the 1950s. The facility was built with French assistance, under the guise of a textile plant. When American inspectors pressed for clarity, Israeli officials offered evasions. President John F. Kennedy, sceptical of the “textile” story, insisted on sending inspectors. According........

© Middle East Monitor