(Version française disponible ici)

Over the past couple of years, I have begun writing more regularly for public audiences – primarily short op-eds based on my research on child development, trauma and youth well-being – to help inform current policy debates.

This shift was prompted in part by being part of a Scholars Strategy Network workshop for the William T. Grant Scholars program, which emphasizes the importance of bringing research into public policy conversations. That imperative is easy to endorse.

Developmental science has much to offer public understanding. The issues to which it speaks – youth mental health, family stress, education, child welfare – are central to policy decisions.

When researchers remain silent, public debates do not pause. Instead, they proceed with partial, simplified or sometimes misleading accounts. In that context, contributing to public discourse feels less like optional outreach and more like a professional responsibility.

But the pathway from research to public debate is not as straightforward as the growing push in academia to “get the evidence out there” would suggest.

In practice, research does not move directly from academic journal articles into policy decisions. It is filtered through a........

© IRPP - Policy Options