Canada doesn’t need AI independence. It needs exit plans for critical sectors
Canada has announced two tools that could shape the country’s artificial intelligence (AI) future.
The Canada Strong Fund is an arm’s-length Crown corporation that will invest alongside private capital in strategic projects, while the Canadian sovereign AI compute strategy offers federal support to AI computing capacity for researchers, firms and innovators.
But tools are not doctrine. Without a clear mandate, AI sovereignty risks becoming either a slogan attached to a general investment fund or an unaffordable attempt to build everything at home.
Canada needs a narrower, more credible objective — trusted hybrid sovereignty. That means working with allied hyperscalers and private operators where they provide scale and capability, while ensuring Canada has legal control, audit rights, workload portability and emergency fallback capacity for designated critical public sector uses.
In other words, an exit plan that is workload-specific.
A Canadian hospital should be able to leave any single AI vendor without losing patient care continuity. A tax agency should be able to switch fraud detection systems if a vendor’s terms change.
This is not a strategic exit from allied AI co-operation, which Canada cannot afford and does not need. It is the ordinary discipline of not letting any single critical public function depend on a vendor it cannot leave or lose.
Services upon which Canadians depend should keep functioning when access, price, law or geopolitics turns against them.
Not a digital services tax by another name
Canada withdrew its digital services tax in 2025 to advance broader trade negotiations with the United States after criticism from tech giants and U.S. President Donald Trump. Any new mechanism that appears to target U.S. technology firms through the back door would likely face the same........
