We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close
Aa Aa Aa
- A +

The latest from the Weinstein jury suggests we’re in for a surprise

1 15 14

On Friday, 21 February, after four days of deliberation, the jury in Harvey Weinstein’s criminal trial made an announcement of sort. It wasn’t a verdict – not quite. It was more complex – and almost more captivating – than that.

The jurors had a question.

They wanted to know whether they could end up deadlocked on some of the key charges faced by the former Hollywood mogul. And by “could”, I mean that the jurors – seven men and five women – were seeking permission from the judge not to rule on those counts. The judge had none of it and urged them to keep deliberating. It’s not uncommon for a jury to struggle when it comes to reach a unanimous decision, Justice James Burke explained, adding: “Please resume your deliberations.”

Sharing the full story, not just the headlines

The predatory sexual assault charges are the heaviest counts faced by Weinstein in the New York case. If convicted on those charges, the 67-year-old Weinstein could spend the rest of his life behind bars (each count carries a minimum of 25 years in prison). Those charges also carry the heaviest burden of proof: by........

© Independent