In every democracy, politicians are entrusted with a clear mandate to lead, legislate, and represent the concerns of the people. Their role is fundamental to governance and nation-building. Yet, in recent times, a growing sentiment among citizens reflects a sense of fatigue and frustration, why do politicians feel compelled to involve themselves in almost every issue, no matter how minor, local, or unrelated to core governance? This question is not merely rhetorical. It points toward a deeper transformation in the nature of politics itself one that has blurred the boundaries between responsibility and overreach.

At the heart of this phenomenon lies the politics of visibility. In an era driven by 24/7 news cycles, social media platforms, and instant public reactions, silence has become a liability. A politician who does not speak is often perceived as inactive, indifferent, or disconnected. As a result, there is constant pressure to remain visible, to react quickly, and to insert oneself into ongoing conversations. Presence has become synonymous with performance. However, visibility alone does not explain everything. In many cases, political engagement arises from a genuine need to highlight issues that affect the daily lives of ordinary citizens. Rising costs of living, unemployment, deteriorating infrastructure, public safety concerns, and local administrative failures are real problems. When political voices raise these issues, question authorities, and demand accountability, they are fulfilling an essential democratic role. In fact, a healthy democracy depends on such engagement. Citizens expect their representatives to be accessible, aware, and responsive. They want leaders who speak up when systems fail and who amplify the voices of those who might otherwise go unheard. In this sense, political involvement is not just justified it is necessary. At the same time, it is important to acknowledge that not everyone........

© Greater Kashmir