Why Mumbai Can’t Have Its Own Zohran Mamdani — And What NYC’s Political Shift Reveals About India’s Urban Democratic Crisis
The recent election in New York that catapulted the 34-year-old Zohran Mamdani of Indian descent, a self-confessed democratic socialist and a visible Muslim, to the highest office in the world’s most capitalised city has had the commentariat weighing in.
Indeed, why not? When was the last time that municipal elections anywhere made global headlines and had the world’s most powerful billionaires running around to hedge their interests? This could be a profound shift in local urban politics given that NYC is watched, followed, and replicated by cities around the world.
While acknowledging the parallels that exist in the conditions between the centre of global capitalism and other cities, and recognising the possibilities that Mamdani’s campaign and win—the campaign was a major refreshing change—we must ask if a ‘Zohran Mamdani’ can ever rise in Mumbai or in any Indian city for that matter. The answer hangs in the polluted air that’s now enveloping Mumbai, Delhi, and other cities across India.
The political systems and democratic architecture differ between NYC and Mumbai or Delhi, but that is not the only reason that it would be tremendously difficult, if not entirely impossible, for a Mamdani-like figure to emerge.
The mayor in Mumbai would not have the power that Mamdani will have as the NYC mayor; it’s a factor of our Constitution and the governance framework that persists despite the 74th Amendment that devolved power to urban local bodies.
Even when, occasionally, some slices of power have been grabbed by local authorities, they........





















Toi Staff
Sabine Sterk
Penny S. Tee
Gideon Levy
Mark Travers Ph.d
Gilles Touboul
John Nosta
Daniel Orenstein
Rachel Marsden