Minimum Credible Deterrence Vs Full Spectrum Deterrence In South Asia – OpEd

The strategic landscape of South Asia has been shaped significantly by the nuclear policies of India and Pakistan. The concept of deterrence plays a central role in maintaining the precarious balance of power in the region. Two primary doctrines have emerged: Minimum Credible Deterrence (MCD) and Full Spectrum Deterrence (FSD). Understanding these doctrines and their implications is crucial for comprehending the ongoing security dynamics in South Asia.

Minimum Credible Deterrence is a strategic doctrine that emphasizes maintaining a nuclear arsenal sufficient to deter an adversary from launching a first strike. This concept hinges on the belief that even a limited nuclear capability can dissuade an opponent from initiating a conflict due to the potential for unacceptable damage in retaliation.

India has traditionally adhered to the doctrine of Minimum Credible Deterrence. New Delhi’s nuclear policy, articulated in its Nuclear Doctrine, emphasizes maintaining a credible minimum deterrent and adhering to a no-first-use policy. India’s focus is on survivability and assured retaliation, ensuring that it can respond effectively to any nuclear aggression.

In contrast to MCD, Full Spectrum Deterrence is a more expansive approach to nuclear deterrence. It........

© Eurasia Review