The Mongol invasion of Iran in the 13th century marked a profound rupture in the historical continuity of Iranian civilization. Beyond the physical destruction of cities and the decimation of populations, the psychological and institutional trauma of Mongol rule fundamentally altered Iran’s political trajectory.

The administrative structures imposed by the Mongols—characterized by centralized absolutism, coercion, and rigid hierarchy—were antithetical to the indigenous traditions of Mehr, which had historically guided Iranian governance through principles of compassion, communal responsibility, and pragmatic inclusivity (Briant, 2002).

As Mongol hegemony waned, Iran did not revert to its pre-invasion civilizational ethos but instead institutionalized new forms of totalitarian rule. By the early 16th century, the Safavid dynasty emerged, modeling its authority not on Iran’s native traditions but on the centralized despotism of its Mongol and Turkic predecessors (Savory, 2007). This new political order did not seek to restore the principles of Mehr but instead established a theocratic state rooted in superstition, ideological absolutism, and a militant cult of martyrdom.

Under the Safavid dynasty (1501–1736), Iran underwent a radical transformation, becoming the epicenter of Twelver Shiism, a sect that had previously been marginal within the broader Islamic world. To consolidate their power, the Safavid rulers engaged in one of the most extensive campaigns of forced religious conversion in history (Newman, 2006). Shiism was imposed as the official creed and those who resisted—whether Sunnis, Sufis, Zoroastrians, or other heterodox communities—were subject to systematic persecution, expulsion, or execution.

Shah Ismail I (r. 1501–1524), the founder of the dynasty, sought to eradicate Sunni influence by violently purging religious scholars and communities. His successors, particularly Shah Abbas I (r. 1588–1629), further institutionalized this sectarian order by eliminating Sunni clerics and forcibly converting Iranian society to Twelver Shiism (Matthee, 1999). The cultivation of an extreme form of Shiite identity revolved around martyrdom, sectarian hatred, and the veneration of suffering as a political virtue. The state-sponsored ideology framed defeat in battle, suffering, and death not as failures but as divine triumphs, encapsulated in the Shiite slogan “the victory of blood over the sword” (Arjomand, 1984).

To reinforce this new religious-political order, the Safavid state engaged in waves of Violence, massacring Sunni populations in major cities like Herat and Qandahar. Mass killings and sectarian purges were not isolated events but systemic policies designed to eliminate dissent. Even religious minorities who initially prospered under Safavid rule—such as Armenians and Jews—faced increasing persecution as state ideology hardened (Blair & Bloom, 1995). The transformation of Iran into a Shiite theocracy was not an organic development but a brutal imposition enforced through Violence, indoctrination, and suppression of dissent (Savory, 2007).

Although the Safavid dynasty collapsed in the early 18th century, the Shiite clerical establishment it had empowered continued to exert a profound influence on Iranian politics. The subsequent Qajar dynasty (1789–1925) perpetuated many Safavid-era policies, particularly the close alliance between the state and the Shiite clerical class. Under Qajar rule, sectarian Violence remained a persistent feature of Iranian society. Anti-Sunni pogroms were periodically encouraged by the state, while religious minorities faced systemic discrimination and recurrent episodes of violent repression (Amanat, 2017).

One of the most infamous episodes of religious persecution occurred in the 19th century with the brutal suppression of the Babi movement. This proto-reformist religious movement sought to challenge the authority of the Shiite clergy. Between 1848 and 1853, thousands of Babis were massacred, and their leaders were executed in public spectacles designed to reaffirm the dominance of Twelver Shiism (Momen, 1981). The Qajars, in partnership with the clerical establishment, framed this Violence as a necessary purification of the faith, further entrenching the ideology of martyrdom and divine vengeance.

By the 20th century, Shiite political ideology had become increasingly radicalized, fueled by the revolutionary rhetoric of clerical figures such as Ayatollah Khomeini. The 1979 Islamic Revolution marked the culmination of centuries of sectarian-driven governance, reviving and intensifying the martyrdom-based politics of the Safavid era (Abrahamian, 1982). The newly formed Islamic Republic of Iran institutionalized a global ideology of religious militancy, exporting Violence through its proxies in Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, and Yemen while simultaneously brutalizing its own population. Political dissidents were executed en masse, ideological opponents were imprisoned, and religious minorities continued to face persecution, mirroring the tactics of the Safavid and Qajar periods.

The history of Iran since the Mongol invasion demonstrates a tragic departure from its indigenous principles of Mehr, which had long served as the foundation of Iranian governance and social cohesion. Instead of compassion, justice, and communal solidarity, Iranian society was reconstructed on an ideology of sectarian supremacy, suffering, and perpetual struggle. This ideological shift has not only led to centuries of Violence and repression. However, it has also hindered Iran’s intellectual, cultural, and economic development, trapping the nation in a cycle of internal purges and external conflicts.

A new social contract for Iran must be built on the restoration of Mehr as the foundational principle of governance. This requires a rejection of both the sectarian authoritarianism inherited from the Safavids and the theocratic totalitarianism of the Islamic Republic. Mehr offers an alternative vision:

• Community-Based Governance: Decentralized political structures that empower local communities instead of clerical elites.

• Participatory Democracy: Political representation rooted in direct citizen engagement rather than religious absolutism.

• Economic Justice: Policies designed to empower individuals rather than subjugate them under a coercive state apparatus.

The ghosts of the Safavid past or the clerical tyranny of the present cannot dictate the future of Iran. It must be reclaimed through a conscious effort to dismantle the structures of ideological coercion and sectarian Violence that have defined the nation for half a millennium. Only through Mehr—through the cultivation of compassion, inclusion, and rational governance—can Iran break free from its historical cycles of bloodshed and reclaim its rightful place as a beacon of civilization, knowledge, and human dignity.

References

• Abrahamian, E. (1982). Iran Between Two Revolutions. Princeton University Press.

• Amanat, A. (2017). Iran: A Modern History. Yale University Press.

• Arjomand, S. A. (1984). The Shadow of God and the Hidden Imam: Religion, Political Order, and Societal Change in Shi’ite Iran from the Beginning to 1890. University of Chicago Press.

• Blair, S., & Bloom, J. (1995). The Art and Architecture of Islam, 1250-1800. Yale University Press.

• Briant, P. (2002). From Cyrus to Alexander: A History of the Persian Empire. Eisenbrauns.

• Matthee, R. (1999). The Politics of Trade in Safavid Iran: Silk for Silver, 1600-1730. Cambridge University Press.

• Momen, M. (1981). An Introduction to Shi’i Islam: The History and Doctrines of Twelver Shi’ism. Yale University Press.

• Newman, A. J. (2006). Safavid Iran: Rebirth of a Persian Empire. I.B. Tauris.

• Savory, R. (2007). Iran Under the Safavids. Cambridge University Press.

© Eurasia Review