There is a certain theatrical quality to the claims now circulating in London’s legal corridors—documents laden with grave accusations, sweeping language about “crimes against humanity,” and a narrative that attempts to transform a deeply entangled personal saga into a universal moral cause. But strip away the legal ornamentation, and what remains is a far less heroic story: one of privilege, proximity to power, and the predictable consequences when that proximity turns sour.

Let us begin with Colonel Shahid Uddin Khan, a figure who, by any honest accounting, was not an outsider persecuted by the system, but rather one of its most conspicuous beneficiaries. During the tenure of Sheikh Hasina’s government, Khan operated within an ecosystem where access mattered more than merit, and loyalty often yielded dividends far beyond institutional boundaries. His association with PM’s Security Advisor Tarique Ahmed Siddiqui was not incidental; it was central. In a political environment where influence flowed through tightly controlled channels, such relationships were currency—and Khan spent it well.

It is therefore difficult to accept the current posture of victimhood without a measure of skepticism. When individuals thrive under a system, leveraging its networks, enjoying its patronage, and accumulating wealth and status, they implicitly validate that very system. To later disown it—only when conflicts of interest arise or when the same machinery turns inward—suggests not principled dissent but opportunistic repositioning. Khan’s subsequent penalization, widely attributed to internal conflicts and overreach, appears less like persecution and more like the inevitable correction of a system reacting to one of its own excesses.

This pattern is........

© Blitz