Experts examine how Azerbaijan pursued justice outside international courts

By restoring its territorial integrity and bringing alleged war criminals before the courts, Azerbaijan has pursued a rare post-conflict path that links sovereignty with legal accountability.

In modern conflict history, it is uncommon for a state to both restore full territorial control and subsequently conduct domestic judicial proceedings against individuals accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity linked to that conflict. Azerbaijan’s post-war trajectory stands out precisely because it has attempted to do both.

Yesterday, after a long trial, the Baku Military Court finally pronounced its final verdict on several Armenian citizens imprisoned for serious crimes. A group of individuals who were once found guilty of illegal military activities in Karabakh, as well as war crimes, massacres of civilians, and acts of terrorism, received the punishment they deserved in the eyes of justice. However, this was justice achieved not by international law, but by Azerbaijan itself. The trials have been conducted in open court, with documentary evidence presented, witness testimonies heard, and defendants given the opportunity to speak.

But despite all this, there are many who want to justify crime or criminals in international tribunals. Several foreign experts who approach the issue from a legal perspective also note that such an indifferent, and even ambiguous approach to criminal acts in the international community clearly demonstrates personal goals and biased positions. For example, American political expert Peter Tase notes that the opinions voiced in the parliament of a country like France demonstrate a literal disrespect for the country's legal principles. He assessed this act of France as a blow to the peace-building plan today.

"It is an incredible moment for the US........

© AzerNews