Denmark: The Danes Go to the Polls |
Foreign Policy > Denmark
Denmark: The Danes Go to the Polls
Danish elections are complicated. Needless to say, that's why there is some uncertainty.
Stephen Helgesen | March 21, 2026
Three weeks ago, the Danish Prime Minister called for a snap election, several months ahead of schedule.
Denmark's Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen seems to have calculated that her Social Democrat Party had a better chance of winning more votes in the Spring than in the Fall (the Danish Constitution requires that elections be held every four years but that the timing is left up to the government as long as it does not exceed the four-year deadline which is the Fall of 2026).
So Election Day will be on March 24.
All twelve Danish political parties have been scrambling to hang up their election posters on streetlights, organizing voter meetings and appearing on Danish radio and television in debates. Debates in Denmark are unlike those in the United States. Candidates do not interrupt each other nor do they go for their opponents’ jugulars. Interaction is civilized and proper. Tempers do not flare and ad hominem attacks are rare.
Issues and political platforms are debated and party candidates do so without resorting to cheap shots, innuendo or soundbites. Since there are so many political parties, debates are long. An interesting fact of political life in Denmark is how political parties are established. Basically, anyone can establish a political party here. They usually start as political “organizations” that have a basic party platform and a name along with principal board members. There is no citizenship requirement to start a political movement, form an organization, write a platform or recruit members. There is no fee for doing so, either. This is protected by the Danish “freedom of association.”
Getting on the Danish ballot is another story, entirely. A party or movement needs to get 20,000 signatures of Danish citizens to get on the ballot and those signatures cannot be collected by non-Danish citizens. In order to become elected to the Danish Parliament (to get a seat), a party needs to win a minimum of 2% of the vote. The low number of signatures may explain why there are so many political parties in Denmark and why governing requires coalitions of parties.
The current governing coalition here is with the “Socialdemokratiet” (Social Democrats), the party called “Venstre” (which actually translates as “Left” though it is a right of center party) and the “Moderaterne” (moderates). The Social Democrats came to power with 27.5% of the vote and 50 seats in the parliament; Venstre had 13.3% and 23 seats in the parliament and the Moderaterne had 9.3% and 16 seats in the parliament. Together, the governing coalition has 89 seats in the Danish parliament (”Folketing”).
A majority in the Folketing requires 90 seats, so the government has one seat short of a clear majority and this means that it is technically a minority coalition government and must rely on support from other parties to pass legislation. That means it must not only find common ground with its own coalition, but must make deals with outside parties.
It is highly unlikely that the coming election will give any one party a clear majority. The Social Democrats lost seats in municipal elections last year and they are expected to lose support on the 24th. Another three-party coalition is predicted, but the three parties could either be a “red” (leftist) coalition or a “blue” (centrist or right-of-center) one.
The prime minister has been on a crusade to soften her “iron lady” image and her primary opponent, the current Minister of Defense (head of the Venstre Party) has been working hard to toughen up his own. Other parties are jockeying for position and currying favor wherever they see the power shifting in the hopes of being a part of new government.
An opinion poll conducted just a few days ago puts the support for the center-left/left coalition at 48.5% (Socialdemokratiet at 21.1%, Socialistisk Folkeparti at 13.0% and Enhedslisten at 6.8%).
Support for the center-right/right “blue block” of parties is put at 51.2% (Liberal Alliance at 11.2%, Venstre at 10.2%, Dansk Folkeparti at 8.2%, Danmarksdemokraterne at 7.1%, Konservative at 7.0%, Radikale Venstre at 4.9% and Alternativet at 2.7%).
A “red” coalition which included the “Enhedslisten” (the most radical of the leftist parties) would cause great consternation within the business community as a leftist coalition would be tempted to levy new taxes on high wage earners and tighten its grip on Danish business’ ability to compete, globally. They would most certainly expand the “green three-part program” (equivalent to the U.S. “green new deal”) and thereby speed up investments in alternative energy, increase environmental regulations and create problems for many sectors of Danish business. They would also be most likely to increase the size of the Danish government and thereby increase expenditures.
A “blue block” coalition would be most likely to maintain the status quo on taxes and spending and regulation. One of the open questions is: “Would the average Dane be comfortable with an intensified left-leaning government and could such a coalition refrain from making any drastic changes that would upset the average taxpayer and the business sector?” This is seen in the light of previous center-left coalitions that have governed Denmark for decades and have managed to be more moderate in their approach to taxation and regulatory matters.
Over the past twenty years, the Danes have become richer as a nation and have also become more comfortable with a balance of capitalism and what they call “social humanism (or “social democracy”). They have been able to keep more of their income and have seen their portfolios grow.
It is my belief that the majority of them (at least those in the countryside and those not living in Copenhagen which has a concentration of left-leaning voters) will not vote for a “pure” left-of-center coalition government, so the question remains: “Can a coalition of three left-of-center parties like the Social Democrats, the Socialist People’s Party and Enhedslisten find a third member from the “blue block” to form a government with them like the “Radikale Venstre” and end up with a governing majority of 53.4%?”
It is doubtful that any “blue block” parties would want to form a government with the Socialist People’s Party or the ultra-left Enhedslisten along with the Social Democrats.
It is uncertain if the Social Democrats (21.1%) would totally ignore the leftist parties and instead try to form a government with three of the “blue block” parties like: Liberal Alliance (11.2%), Venstre (10.2%) and Dansk Folkeparti (8.2%) which would give them a majority of 50.7%. But the most unlikely scenario of all is that all seven of the “blue block” parties would suddenly join hands and put away their personality and policy differences to form a new government with 51.2% of the vote.
Much can happen in Danish politics given the various political party combinations that can be put together, and many voters here are still undecided about who will get their vote.
Stephen Helgesen is a retired American diplomat specializing in international trade. He has lived and worked in 30 countries over the course of 25 years under the Reagan, G.H.W. Bush, Clinton, and G.W. Bush administrations. He is the author of fourteen books, seven of them on American politics, and has written more than 1,500 articles on politics, economics, and social trends. He now lives in Denmark and is a frequent political commentator in Danish media. He can be reached at: [email protected]
Image: Pixabay // Pixabay Content License
SUPPORT AMERICAN THINKER
Now more than ever, the ability to speak our minds is crucial to the republic we cherish. If what you see on American Thinker resonates with you, please consider supporting our work with a donation of as much or as little as you can give. Every dollar contributed helps us pay our staff and keep our ideas heard and our voices strong. Thank you.