Politics > Department Of Justice

Peter Ticktin For US Attorney General!

He, more than anyone else, understands the ongoing threat to honest elections and the need for true justice to be brought to members of the Deep State.

Michael J. Flynn (US Army, Lt. Gen., Retired), Jerome R. Corsi | April 15, 2026

Since President Trump’s 2020 loss, Florida-based attorney Peter Ticktin, who’s been his friend since both were 15-year-olds at New York Military Academy, has worked on the issue of election fraud. Ticktin told me,

I knew that night, like most of us with brains, that stopping the count, which never happened before, while Donald Trump was ahead, in 4 swing states, on the night of the election was at least suspicious. Then, the next morning, after a straight vertical line graph for Biden caused Biden’s win and we were all expected to believe that the election was fair. We all knew something terrible happened.

I knew that night, like most of us with brains, that stopping the count, which never happened before, while Donald Trump was ahead, in 4 swing states, on the night of the election was at least suspicious. Then, the next morning, after a straight vertical line graph for Biden caused Biden’s win and we were all expected to believe that the election was fair. We all knew something terrible happened.

In 2022, Ticktin, who is the named partner of the Ticktin Law Group  in Deerfield Beach, Florida, has represented Trump in a lawsuit against Democrat party solons for their actions related to the Russia Hoax, began investigating the events of January 6, 2021. Ultimately, he concluded that it had been a set-up, planned in advance, probably by the same forces that had rigged the election.

Soon after that realization, Tickton learned about the groundbreaking work of Andrew Paquette, Ph.D. As reported on GodsFiveStones.com, Paquette discovered cryptographic algorithms secretly embedded in the voter registration databases of the State Boards of Elections in New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, Florida, New Jersey, and Oklahoma.

These algorithms made it possible to create millions of modified duplicate voters who are assigned legitimate state voter IDs, even though no such voters exist—a scheme Paquette has demonstrated facilitates mail-in ballot fraud. Looked at dispassionately, America’s voting system appears intentionally broken, almost beyond repair, designed to create an illegitimate system in which citizens cannot elect candidates of their choice without interference.

Peter’s reaction to examining Paquette’s data was immediate. “I had enough evidence to know that the Globalists rigged the election,” he told me, “and thanks to Paquette, I understood how, or at least one method.”

At the same time, Ticktin understood how Donald Trump overcame this issue to win in 2024. Moreover, he has paid attention to and wants to investigate claims that foreign actors in places such as Belgrade, Serbia, were able to hack into voting machines to change election outcomes.

In addition to his in-depth knowledge about how the Deep State operates, Ticktin is a tough, no-nonsense guy who knows what the nation needs right now to restore trust and confidence between the Department of Justice and the American people. He has an experienced and sharp legal mind, for he’s successfully worked in the trenches for decades.

Ticktin has seen from the front lines how the DOJ and other American legal institutions were weaponized against MAGA: parents who got arrested at Board of Education meetings, police who are persecuted for using necessary force that’s then deemed excessive, cybercurrency folk who were debanked and prosecuted, attempts to destroy doctors who prescribed Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquin or were against the jab, and the war against young and aggressive businessmen who love Trump.

Looking at this wreckage, he understands the national security implications going forward if this trust is not restored. Armed with that knowledge, Ticktin has a plan to revamp the DOJ.

Pam Bondi’s problem, Ticktin believes, isn’t that she was a bad person who didn’t support President Trump. Instead, she was undermined by people within the DOJ. Anything the establishment can control—e.g., the pardon process’s snail pace, the failure to charge anyone—reflects an inner cohort that has no interest in changing the status quo.

Todd Blanche, as interim acting DOJ is taking steps to recognizing the DOJ to make it more efficient, but only Peter Tickton, who has been working closely with Trump for years in the post January 6 environment, fully understands what needs to be done to remedy that profound wrong: He knows who needs to be brought to justice and who among the innocent need to be compensated for the wrongs done to them.

Above all, Ticktin, whose friendship with Trump spans more than half a century, will be the reliable ally Trump needs in the upcoming months and years. He understands that those who stole the 2020 election have the same plans for the 2026 midterms and the 2028 presidential election—and time is getting short to fix arm elections against manipulation.

Ticktin is aided by his long experience fighting Democrats in the legal system. In 2016, he was the lead local counsel in a Florida federal court case. The case alleged a “racketeering” conspiracy, led by Hillary Clinton, to tie Trump’s campaign to “Russian collusion.” Early in Trump’s second term, Ticktin represented several J6 pardon requests. These included one for Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes, which he submitted to Ed Martin, then serving as the DOJ pardon attorney.

Ticktin also obtained a pardon for Tina Peters from President Trump. He later successfully represented her before the Colorado Court of Appeals, persuading the court to vacate her nine-year prison sentence for her efforts to reveal voting irregularities in Mesa County.

As Attorney General, Peter Ticktin can use the recent Supreme Court decision in Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections as the basis for launching federal challenges to state rules and regulations governing presidential elections. In the 6-3 decision, Chief Justice John Roberts held that Congressman Michael Bost had standing to dispute an Illinois law requiring mail-in ballots to be postmarked or certified by election date and received within two weeks after election day.

The Supreme Court determined that a candidate may challenge a state election procedure as “unfair” before an election occurs, without having to show actual disadvantage: “[A]n unlawful extension of vote counting deprives candidates of the opportunity for election under the Constitution and laws of the United States.”

Robert’s comment reinforces the precedent that while the Constitution gives state legislatures the power to set rules for presidential elections, those rules must comply with federal statutes and the constitutional protections established by federal courts. Democrats who write state rules allowing non-citizens to vote would be ill-advised to argue non-citizens have a right to vote in federal elections, even if that is their clear intention.

Candidates have a concrete and particularized interest in the rules that govern the counting of votes in their elections, regardless whether those rules harm their electoral prospects or increase the cost of their campaigns. Their interest extends to the integrity of the election—and the democratic process by which they earn or lose the support of the people they seek to represent.

Candidates have a concrete and particularized interest in the rules that govern the counting of votes in their elections, regardless whether those rules harm their electoral prospects or increase the cost of their campaigns. Their interest extends to the integrity of the election—and the democratic process by which they earn or lose the support of the people they seek to represent.

We have previously argued that evidence that China sought to influence the 2020 election, along with vulnerabilities in electronic voting systems to hackers, elevates election integrity from a law enforcement issue within the DOJ or FBI to a national security investigation. We further argued that President Trump’s Commander-in-Chief powers mean that, after declaring a national security emergency, he could order the National Guard to secure election integrity in all 50 states. This would require state election boards to block non-citizens from voting, mandate voter IDs, compel the use of paper ballots, and impound computers used to record and tabulate votes. We believe that Peter Ticktin would support these core constitutional principles for honest elections.

The Democrats will assuredly go all in to defeat Peter Ticktin during confirmation hearings. Yet challenging Ticktin on points of constitutional law would only give him the opportunity to expose the Democrats’ true intentions to a national TV audience: to seek power by doing whatever is necessary to win majorities in the House and Senate.

With those majorities, House Democrats would impeach Trump, and Senate Democrats would remove him from office. That the only goal of those currently in control of the Democrat party is to grab political power by whatever means necessary is apparent to those of us who take the issue of voter integrity seriously.

Nor would Ticktin fail on everyday matters that confront Americans when dealing with the federal government. He actually offers fairness and the willingness to shrink the behemoth that is the modern DOJ. That should appeal to those who seek justice from the Justice Department.

Peter Ticktin is a common man, a lawyer who built his own practice. He is a businessman who ran the Pony Express in the early 2000s and has the knowledge, managerial experience, and wisdom to lead the DOJ. Expect that, if he is appointed, he will hit the ground running, and we will quickly observe the changes we have been longing to see.

You can learn about Ticktin’s unique relationship with Trump in his 2020 book, What Makes Trump Tick: My Years with Donald Trump from New York Military Academy to the Present.

YouTube screen grab (cropped).

SUPPORT AMERICAN THINKER

Now more than ever, the ability to speak our minds is crucial to the republic we cherish. If what you see on American Thinker resonates with you, please consider supporting our work with a donation of as much or as little as you can give. Every dollar contributed helps us pay our staff and keep our ideas heard and our voices strong. Thank you.

© American Thinker