Hollywood is eating itself alive, and you should care |
Culture > Popular Culture
Hollywood is eating itself alive, and you should care
Behold a visually, financially, and culturally ruinous spectacle unfolding in real time.
Joseph Ford Cotto | March 24, 2026
The 2026 awards season has laid bare a stark truth: Hollywood is no longer a tidal force that commands rapt attention. It has become a bottomless money pit. A self-destructive, crumbling empire that sacrificed broad appeal to gratify the narrow passions of its woke captors.
The Golden Globes opened the season with 8.66 million viewers, down 7 percent from the prior year’s 9.27 million, and a shadow of its 2020 peak of 18.3 million. The 68th Grammy Awards followed with 14.41 million viewers, a 6.4 percent decline from the previous year’s roughly 15.4 million. It suffered especially among adults 18–49.
Even the Oscars, hosted again by Conan O’Brien, drew only 17.86–17.9 million viewers, a 9 percent drop from 2025. This was the smallest audience since 2022, with the key 18–49 demographic plummeting 14 percent. Nielsen data confirmed that these declines were not anomalies. They reflected a continuing erosion of live broadcast audiences for Tinseltown’s once-grand spectacles.
This drop in viewers is a symptom of a deeper illness.
Hollywood’s physical and economic heart—Los Angeles—has been hemorrhaging blood for years. Film and television production in L.A. plummeted 24 percent year-over-year in major scripted projects. Total shoot days collapsed from nearly 37,000 circa 2022 to under 20,000 in 2025.
The city lost roughly 41,000 entertainment jobs between 2022 and 2024. This happened as studios consolidated and shifted work abroad. Costs were slashed amid mounting debt, approaching $80 billion, from major mergers like Paramount-Skydance and Warner Bros. Discovery.
The domestic box office closed 2025 at roughly $8.9 billion, flat with 2024, but well below pre-COVID-19 era levels. Wide theatrical releases continued to shrink, with only 94 films reaching more than 2,000 locations in 2024. That is a steep decline from 120 movies in 2019.
At the same time, Hollywood’s creative output has become increasingly out of step with American audiences.
Paul Thomas Anderson’s One Battle After Another, the Best Picture winner at the Oscars, exemplifiesthe problem. His film is a black-comedy action-thriller depicting armed raids, bombings, and glorified resistance against a caricatured immigration-controlling, white-supremacist federal government. This movie swept six Oscars, including Best Picture and Best Director.
Yet it grossed only about $210 million worldwide, against a $130 million budget, plus heavy marketing. When all is said and done, the picture is projected to lose nearly $100 million. Hollywood celebrated the film internally while the broader audience largely ignored it. This was a clear demonstration that virtue-signaling, not audience engagement, drives industry decision-making.
This pattern extends beyond one film.
Disney’s 2025 live-action Snow White remake reportedly lost $170 million at the box office. This was part of over $1 billion in cumulative losses from Disney and Marvel projects incorporating woke themes. Other releases, including a woke-up streaming reboot of The ‘Burbs, similarly flopped.
Audiences clearly reject content where woke pageantry trumps entertainment. Viewers respond by staying home when studios prioritize trendy leftism over storytelling. Even Pixar, long regarded as a reliable brand, saw its woke Elio post the studio’s lowest opening weekend ever. Meanwhile, more wholesome family content like Hoppers achieved stronger results.
Tinseltown’s internal culture intensifies these problems.
Timothée Chalamet, one of Hollywood’s rare rising stars, made the common-sense remark that he did not want to devote his career to art forms such as ballet or opera. His rationale was simple: audiences are drying up for both. Chalamet reserves his considerable talent for a broader swath of the public. The arts community attacked him for this, calling his comments “shocking” and “narrow-minded.”
At the Oscars, Conan O’Brien mocked Chalamet’s stance, turning it into a punchline during the broadcast. This public shaming for advocating broad appeal underscores how deeply Hollywood’s hive-mind culture has internalized its ideological and cultural orthodoxies. Commonsense, market-driven thinking gets punished.
The sidelining of young white men in creative roles illustrates another dimension of the issue.
Their share of lower-level TV writing collapsed from around 60 percent in 2011 to just 11.9 percent by 2025, while minority women rose to 34.6 percent. At Sundance’s Screenwriters Lab, straight white men came to constitute only one in ten Millennial participants. The Oscars boast of “Representation and Inclusion Standards” for Best Picture. These marginalize Caucasians, males, and Caucasian males especially.
This systematic exclusion reflects policies that prioritize identity politics over merit and broad audience appeal. Hollywood’s creative pipeline is narrowed, shaping content to satisfy woke intersectionality rather than the public’s taste.
Awards shows themselves provide a visual metaphor for this decline.
Following the 2026 Oscars, images circulated showing rows of empty seats littered with snack wrappers, water bottles, and popcorn bags. The spectacle is meticulously staged, yet the aftermath reveals a culture more interested in self-celebration than public consideration.
Meanwhile, NBCUniversal quietly ended Access Hollywood after nearly 30 years, acknowledging that daytime audiences have evaporated. Simply put, folks across the fruited plains no longer care about Tinseltown.
Even production economics reflect ideological missteps.
Studios continue remaking classics with trendy lefty twists, yet these films underperform, alienating the very audiences that once ensured profitability. The cumulative cost of woke projects has now reached billions, yet internal incentives remain skewed toward performative stunts rather than profitability. The disconnect between Hollywood priorities and audience behavior feeds a self-destructive cycle: alienate mass audiences, double down on virtue signaling, repeat.
Tinseltown’s luminaries appear largely indifferent.
Executives, stars, and awards voters signal virtue within their own bubble while ignoring tangible indicators of public disinterest. The industry, in essence, is eating itself alive, smiling as it digests its own flesh and internal organs. Jobs flee to Georgia, productions relocate to Kentucky, Burbank-backed flops mount, and star-driven L.A. ceremonies fail to attract the viewers they once commanded.
The consequences are financial, cultural, and social: a $100 million Oscar loser, shrinking audiences, collapsing prestige, and a creative workforce narrowed by woke litmus tests.
This collapse is a warning.
Hollywood once set trends for the nation and the world, shaping music, film, television, and cultural discourse. Today, it survives as a cautionary tale. Tinseltown illustrates what happens when an industry substitutes self-righteous, yet ultimately toxic, politics for the platinum economic model that made it an awe-inspiring powerhouse.
The 2026 awards season is the clearest evidence yet: “get woke, go broke” is no slogan. It is reality. Colossal audiences are voting with their attention and dollars, rejecting content and institutions that prioritize intersectional leftist virtue-signaling over story, spectacle, and entertainment.
For Americans, the lesson is unambiguous.
When even the most elite, insulated cultural institutions prioritize ideological purity over mass appeal, the economic and social consequences are severe. Hollywood is no longer a viable economic engine or a pop-cultural touchstone. It is a grotesque, self-consumed spectacle, with luminaries largely, proudly, and perversely unconcerned about its decline.
Observing Tinseltown’s fall should prompt reflection across industries of every stripe. Relevance, engagement, sustainability, and profitability depend on delivering value to the broad public. Enforcing conformity within a bubble may feel good, but so does poisoned candy.
Hollywood’s current trajectory is not ascending into Beverly Hills but crashing out into Detroit. Showbiz will survive, yet Tinseltown increasingly resembles the Rust Belt. This is a cautionary tale written in real dollars, with dwindling audiences having collapsed careers.
Behold a visually, financially, and culturally ruinous spectacle unfolding in real time.
Dr. Joseph Ford Cotto is the creator, host, and producer of News Sight, delivering sharp insights on the key events that shape our lives. He publishes Dr. Cotto's Digest, sharing how business and the economy really impact us all. During the 2024 presidential race, he developed the Five-Point Forecast, which accurately predicted Donald Trump’s national victory and correctly called every swing state. Cotto holds a doctorate in business administration and is a Lean Six Sigma Certified Black Belt.
SUPPORT AMERICAN THINKER
Now more than ever, the ability to speak our minds is crucial to the republic we cherish. If what you see on American Thinker resonates with you, please consider supporting our work with a donation of as much or as little as you can give. Every dollar contributed helps us pay our staff and keep our ideas heard and our voices strong. Thank you.