There’s a piece at The Free Press about how Wikipedia maintains its lefty slant. In addition to its lefty editors, there’s a Wikimedia: Reliable Sources/Perennial Sources page dividing media into “Generally reliable,” “No consensus,” and “Generally unreliable.” Don´t try pushing any sources in the unreliable non-lefty category.
Meanwhile our liberal friends are planning reforms to return the Trump Supreme Court to the glory days when the justices and the educated elite all agreed that “the Constitution means what we the chosen say it does.” And don’t you dare disagree.
Then there’s the war on misinformation and “hate speech,” from Brazil to Britain to the EU to France. Wikipedia first published a four-line misinformation piece in July 2005. By January 2015 it was a couple of pages; today it goes on for ages about fact-checking. If you want short and sweet go to the Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency’s MDM page.
It was the best of times; it was the worst of times. And I think that, for our rulers, the age of the internet is the worst of times.
The fact is that the regime is fit to be tied. You can tell that from the #WeBelieve yard signs put out by nice liberal ladies in the months after the Trump........