expand_moreexpand_less
Aeon
Al Jazeera
América Economía
Blitz
Buenos Aires Herald
Deutsche Welle
Dnevnik
E-International
Haaretz
Il Manifesto Global
Japan Today
Khaama PressMiddle East Monitor
New Eastern OutlookNikkei Asian ReviewOped Column
Pravda.sk
Project Syndicate
Psychology TodayRT.comSME.sk
South China Morning PostThe Asahi ShimbunThe DiplomatThe Japan NewsThe Japan Times
The Korea TimesThe Times of IsraelThe Times of Israel (Blogs)Večer
العين الإخبارية 
Toi StaffEmanuel FabianJacob MagidAgenciesReuters
Gideon LevyLazar BermanLuke TressDavid HorovitzGianluca PacchianiAmérica EconomíaThe Japan News EditorialRenee Ghert-ZandRon KampeasCanaan LidorMatt LebovicAmy SpiroCathryn J. Prince
Belen Fernandez
Rami G KhouriOthman MoqbelSam SokolJeremy SharonJessica SteinbergCharlie SummersAmanda Borschel-DanElana KirshSue Surkes
Mort LaitnerZvi Bar&x27ElNatan OdenheimerYuli TamirThe Asahi ShimbunBradley Blankenship
Donald LowStephen GrovesEran Yashiv
Ali Fathollah-NejadSharon WrobelRachel MarsdenE-International RelationsCarolina LandsmannSlavoj ŽižekEfrat RaytenAmira HassAbbas JumaJames ShimanyulaMegan KangJapan TodayEugene Brusilovskiy
|
|
John Charles SimonPsychology Today |
When the best laid plans backfire, they can become truly laughable.
Why we sometimes view evidence of both good and bad fortune as amusing.
A new conceptual model of laughter reveals why earlier notions thrived.
New explanations should be able to explain why their predecessors flourished.
Why sympathetic, supportive laughter can be mistaken as derisive.
Thoughts on the proliferation of laughter and humor in the last 6 million years.
Speculating on early developments in the evolution of humor.
login
who are we?
contact us
qosheapp
