“If spending money like water was the answer to our country’s problems,” Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher said in 1980, less than two years after the United Kingdom’s Winter of Discontent, “we would have no problems now. If ever a nation has spent, spent, spent and spent again, ours has.”
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Don't have an account? Create Account
That a government cannot spend away the country’s problems is a clear lesson of history. The Trudeau government evidently has not learned this — it has spent, spent and spent more and the country’s problems have gotten worse.
In 2014-15, before the Liberals took office, federal program spending was 12.8% of Gross Domestic Product (the value of final goods and services produced in Canada). In 2023-24, it is projected at 15.7%. And relative to 2014-15, annual program spending is $89 billion higher than if it had tracked with overall economic growth.
As Thatcher would have predicted, this extra spending has not solved most problems. Consider health care. The Fraser Institute’s survey of health-care specialists found a median wait time of 27.7 weeks between referral from a general practitioner and receipt of treatment in 2023 — a 51% increase versus 18.3 weeks in 2015. Relative to peer countries, Canada is a big health-care spender but with poor results, and is far below average on key metrics such as physicians and hospital beds per capita.
Get the latest headlines, breaking news and columns.
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of The Winnipeg Sun's Daily Headline News will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Another big spending area is climate change. The Liberals boast of pouring more than $120 billion into climate programs, but even with an annually increasing carbon tax and onerous regulation on top of that spending, the government is on track to miss its 2030 climate targets. Given the high cost of its climate policies relative to environmental benefits, that’s not a bad thing. Ottawa’s climate targets are wildly unrealistic, and achieving them would mean devastating the economy further.
Speaking of devastating the economy, when the Trudeau government spends, it claims it will support economic growth, increase affordability or otherwise deliver financial benefits. Eight years in, these benefits have not materialized. As of the third quarter of 2023, after five consecutive quarters of declining real GDP per capita, Canada’s cumulative growth in the past eight years is a paltry 1.6% versus 14.7% in the United States. One way to think about this gap: if Canada’s real GDP per capita growth tracked with the U.S. since the Liberals took office, Canadian living standards would be about 12.8% higher than they are today.
Finally, the Trudeau government has significantly ramped up child-care spending, but the effect of the national child-care program has been to severely distort and in many cases destroy the child-care sector by applying a discriminatory funding model that pushes child-care entrepreneurs out of the market and discourages private investment. The federal program is composed of separate agreements with the provinces, but with the child-care sector suffering crisis and widespread shortages from coast to coast, it’s reasonable to conclude Ottawa’s plan is fatally flawed.
Wherever you look, the pattern is the same — federal spending is up, but outcomes are worse. The government creates problems and does not solve them when it spends money like water. Margaret Thatcher well understood this fact. Justin Trudeau, unfortunately, evidently does not.
Matthew Lau is an adjunct scholar with the Fraser Institute
Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.
LAU: Trudeau cranks up spending but Canadians are worse off
6
0
17.01.2024
“If spending money like water was the answer to our country’s problems,” Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher said in 1980, less than two years after the United Kingdom’s Winter of Discontent, “we would have no problems now. If ever a nation has spent, spent, spent and spent again, ours has.”
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Don't have an account? Create Account
That a government cannot spend away the country’s problems is a clear lesson of history. The Trudeau government evidently has not learned this — it has spent, spent and spent more and the country’s problems have gotten worse.
In 2014-15, before the Liberals took office, federal program spending was 12.8% of Gross Domestic Product (the value of final goods and services produced in Canada). In 2023-24, it is projected at 15.7%. And relative to 2014-15, annual program spending is $89 billion higher than if it had tracked with overall economic growth.
As Thatcher would........
© Winnipeg Sun
visit website
login
who are we?
contact us
qosheapp
Toi Staff
Gideon Levy
Belen Fernandez
Rami G Khouri
Mort Laitner
Donald Low
Ali Fathollah-Nejad
Nikkei Editorial
