Hold your wine glass steady: the BBC has news for you. This week it splashed the news that train drivers in the UK are ‘overwhelmingly middle-aged white men’. The story was accompanied by a picture of a black woman driving a train – under the supervision of a white man, it might be noted – as though to signal that this glass ceiling too can be smashed.

Personally I would expect train drivers to be overwhelmingly middle-aged, white and indeed male. Most of the UK is white and half of the UK is male. And the male half of the species tends to be more train-oriented. You don’t see many single women standing at the end of Reading station noting down train numbers in a little book. There may be hardwired reasons for this. So I would put the BBC’s train-driver story into the same ‘breaking news’ list as ‘most kindergarten teachers are women’ and ‘most people who run successful corner shops are immigrants’. In other words: not a story.

I’m not sure I want much creativity in my train drivers. I prefer them to be slightly plodding, uncreative types

But of course it’s not really about news. It is another example that tells us something deeper about the age.

Until recently, the only professions in which people obsessed about ‘representation’ were the more high-status ones. One of the madnesses that came out of the #MeToo movement was the idea that if an actress in Hollywood is paid eight million bucks and her male co-star is paid ten million for the same movie then we should all take to the streets to protest this appalling inequality and indeed oppression. Pity the stunning multi-millionaire actress, everyone; we are all Angelina Jolie now, etc.

Company boards were another focus – as though most of the public were regularly bothered by the question of which company boards to sit on. It was decided at some point in the past decade that any company whose board had too many men on it must be ‘diversified’. Which means it’s been a boom time for any potential ethnic–minority board members, while some of the cannier gays spotted a useful ladder. And then there were women, of course. California passed legislation a few years ago insisting that all companies registered in the state must have a quota of people from a list of minorities. That list was itself pretty interesting. It included trans people, obviously. Because if you are after diversity of thinking, it is always good to have input from somebody whose body is being pumped full of oestrogen or testosterone.

The Californian list also included Pacific Islanders. I did the maths and worked out that given the demand for trans and Pacific Island board members vs the relative supply in the state, if you were a trans person or a Pacific Islander living in California, you should clear your diary for the 2020s, because you’ll be shuttling from board meeting to board meeting with never an hour for yourself.

Personally, I had expected this diversity obsession to remain fixed on high-status professions. Because it was noticeable that, for example, while the vast preponderance of road-layers who mix the tarmac to sometimes fill in the nation’s potholes are men, there is yet to be an outcry along the lines of ‘none of us are free until women are made to lay more tarmac’. Now it seems that the age is indeed even madder than I thought.

This is why we now have the idea that even train driving must be diversified. Take the words of Zoey Hudson, who is the head of talent, diversity and inclusion at Southern Railway. You may not have known that such a role existed, but it does, and Zoey is able to spout the usual verbiage that comes with her line of work. As she told the BBC, diversity ‘freshens’ the rail network. ‘It’s really important that we have diversity of thinking within the railway, which is as important as diversity of ethnicity. It brings creativity.’

For my part, I’m not sure I want much creativity in my train drivers. In fact I prefer them to be slightly plodding, uncreative types. Loyal, punctual, good in a crisis: these are the sort of qualities that I look for before boarding the 7.48 to Totnes. But creativity?

Happily for their own career prospects, a diversity officer’s work is never done. Because only one in ten British train drivers is a woman, it seems that Zoey and her colleagues are also on a mission to push more women into the railways. It’s something to do, I suppose, but there is a rather glorious perversity in the idea of persuading women to qualify for a profession that is about to go fully automated. And what will all those creative female train drivers do then, desperate as they will remain for the thrill of the railway while their profession goes driverless?

Let me show my own cards: I don’t believe any of this. I think the whole thing is bunk. This desire to concentrate on stories where middle-aged white men can be cast as blocking the way for everyone else seems a deliberate policy not just of highlighting but of demeaning and demoralising anyone who belongs to what in Britain is still the majority. There is nothing wrong with being white and male. And in a country which is still predominantly white, you would indeed expect white people to be the majority in many industries, as they are in the general population. If you go to India you will find an awful lot of Indian people, and China is strikingly Chinese. But none of these countries have their majority populations addressed as though their very existence is some sort of affront to minorities.

The latest phrase to wheedle its way into the corporate world is ‘global majority’. While job advertisements in Britain used to ask for people from ethnic minorities to step forward, this has been flipped. ‘Ethnic minority’ has become ‘global majority’. If you think that has a slightly menacing air to it, you’d be right – that’s the point. As I have often said, none of this is about justice, equality or letting talent fly.

QOSHE - Diversity trap / Do many women want to be train drivers? - Douglas Murray
menu_open
Columnists Actual . Favourites . Archive
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close
Aa Aa Aa
- A +

Diversity trap / Do many women want to be train drivers?

33 23
03.05.2024

Hold your wine glass steady: the BBC has news for you. This week it splashed the news that train drivers in the UK are ‘overwhelmingly middle-aged white men’. The story was accompanied by a picture of a black woman driving a train – under the supervision of a white man, it might be noted – as though to signal that this glass ceiling too can be smashed.

Personally I would expect train drivers to be overwhelmingly middle-aged, white and indeed male. Most of the UK is white and half of the UK is male. And the male half of the species tends to be more train-oriented. You don’t see many single women standing at the end of Reading station noting down train numbers in a little book. There may be hardwired reasons for this. So I would put the BBC’s train-driver story into the same ‘breaking news’ list as ‘most kindergarten teachers are women’ and ‘most people who run successful corner shops are immigrants’. In other words: not a story.

I’m not sure I want much creativity in my train drivers. I prefer them to be slightly plodding, uncreative types

But of course it’s not really about news. It is another example that tells us something deeper about the age.

Until recently, the only professions in which people obsessed about ‘representation’ were the more high-status ones. One of the madnesses that came out of the #MeToo movement was the idea that if an actress in Hollywood is paid eight million bucks and her male co-star is paid ten million for........

© The Spectator


Get it on Google Play