It is getting worse, not better – and there is no end in sight.

I am referring to Justice Stephen Kaye’s damning decision on the subject of Walter Sofronoff’s conduct and report of an “inquiry into the criminal justice system”. The background was the rape prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann – a charge Lehrmann steadfastly denies and upon which he was not convicted. The damage caused by that night in Canberra continues to spread. Justice Kaye has found that it was reasonable to apprehend that Sofronoff was biased against Lehrmann’s prosecutor, Shane Drumgold SC, when Sofronoff made his harsh findings adverse to Drumgold.

Sofronoff’s inquiry was set up to get to the bottom of problems in the criminal justice system, but the inquiry itself was compromised by bias. Confidence in the legal system is founded upon an assumption of independent, bias-free decision-making. The judgment of Justice Kaye tells us that assumption is false – the conduct and result of Sofronoff’s inquiry shatters whatever confidence there was in the system.

The law was not the only important institution shown to be flawed – so was the fourth estate, our free press. Not only did the commission bellyflop, it went down together with our “national broadsheet”, the Australian.

So what went wrong? Justice Kaye carefully exposes this with agonising detail. After Lehrmann’s aborted trial, questions arose regarding the conduct of the police, the prosecutor and some politicians. Allegations and counter-allegations. An independent inquiry was the only way to get to the truth. A retired judge, Sofronoff, was appointed.

But things went awry straight away. A connection was made between Sofronoff and a “conservative columnist” at the Australian, Janet Albrechtsen. Albrechtsen had written many, many articles attacking the prosecution of Lehrmann as political and severely criticising Drumgold. It was clear that Albrechtsen had taken a position on the very matters which Walter was supposed to be examining. They went to lunch together in Brisbane and commenced personal contact relating to Sofronoff’s inquiry.

Sofronoff has defended this, saying he was following a practice that commissioners make direct personal contact with the press. Sofronoff might think that, but no lawyer I know agrees with him. Everyone has been shocked by his conduct.

But even so there are varying degrees of personal contact. The constant contact between Sofronoff and Albrechtsen, as set out in the judgment, was pretty striking. It started even before the inquiry opened. It continued with a surprising intensity. Sofronoff and Albrechtsen shared more than 50 telephone calls for over 7.5 hours. They exchanged a huge number of text messages, many in a single day. Some emails were sent “secretively” to a private email address. Much of the traffic was initiated by Sofronoff. Meanwhile, Albrechtsen continued banging out negative articles about Drumgold on a daily basis.

The content of their contact was equally surprising. Even before the hearings started, Sofronoff sent Albrechtsen parts of the evidence with comments critical of Drumgold. During the public hearing, Albrechtsen even proposed to Sofronoff that he put particular questions to a witness – and Sofronoff agreed!

It gets worse. During the crucial phase during which Sofronoff was drafting his report, he was actually sending successive versions to Albrechtsen. Changes were made, but Justice Kaye did not make a finding as to why the changes were made or who suggested them. We do know, however, that Sofronoff’s final report closely matched Albrechtsen’s anti-Drumgold narrative. Justice Kaye found it would be reasonable to think that Sofronoff was under Albrechtsen’s “influence”.

Given all of this, it was inevitable that Justice Kaye would find that Drumgold had been denied procedural fairness. Nothing is more fundamental to procedural fairness than a fair hearing conducted by an unbiased decision-maker. Drumgold did not get that. Every finding adverse to Drumgold was made in the absence of a fair hearing. Because of Justice Kaye’s findings, nothing said by Sofronoff retains validity. The report should never have been published – but that decision was denied to the ACT government when Sofronoff gave a copy to Albrechtsen days before he gave it to the chief minister.

Justice Kaye’s decision does not mean that Drumgold has received justice. It is some redress, but nowhere near enough. He has lost his job. He has lost his reputation. I do not know him, but I would be amazed if he was not emotionally damaged.

And Justice Kaye’s scathing finding has not stopped Albrechtsen. The day after the judgment, she pumped out yet another article attacking Drumgold. Why? What further do you want? It is time to stop.

A lot of money has been wasted. Millions of dollars were spent on Sofronoff and his failed inquiry. The ACT government is up for another million or two for the legal costs of the Kaye judgment. I suggest that Walter and Janet put their heads together for one last time and agree to make a solid financial contribution toward the millions of dollars that have been thrown away.

Geoffrey Watson is a former counsel assisting the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption and a director of the Centre for Public Integrity

QOSHE - The Sofronoff saga has shattered whatever confidence we had in our legal system. Here’s what went wrong - Geoffrey Watson
menu_open
Columnists Actual . Favourites . Archive
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close
Aa Aa Aa
- A +

The Sofronoff saga has shattered whatever confidence we had in our legal system. Here’s what went wrong

6 66
06.03.2024

It is getting worse, not better – and there is no end in sight.

I am referring to Justice Stephen Kaye’s damning decision on the subject of Walter Sofronoff’s conduct and report of an “inquiry into the criminal justice system”. The background was the rape prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann – a charge Lehrmann steadfastly denies and upon which he was not convicted. The damage caused by that night in Canberra continues to spread. Justice Kaye has found that it was reasonable to apprehend that Sofronoff was biased against Lehrmann’s prosecutor, Shane Drumgold SC, when Sofronoff made his harsh findings adverse to Drumgold.

Sofronoff’s inquiry was set up to get to the bottom of problems in the criminal justice system, but the inquiry itself was compromised by bias. Confidence in the legal system is founded upon an assumption of independent, bias-free decision-making. The judgment of Justice Kaye tells us that assumption is false – the conduct and result of Sofronoff’s inquiry shatters whatever confidence there was in the system.

The law was not the only important institution shown to be flawed – so was the fourth estate, our free press. Not only did the commission bellyflop, it went down together with our “national broadsheet”, the Australian.

So what went wrong? Justice Kaye carefully........

© The Guardian


Get it on Google Play