Immigration
Liz Wolfe | 1.23.2024 9:30 AM
Bipartisan consensus: A deal is emerging in the Senate, supported by both Republicans and Democrats, that would reduce the number of migrants granted asylum and beef up immigration enforcement. Republicans have stipulated that a border-securing package be agreed to for Democrats to get additional Ukraine funding passed. More proof that whenever both parties agree on something, the resulting policy tends to be suboptimal from a libertarian standpoint. "It will be, by far, the most conservative border security bill in four decades," Sen. James Lankford (R–Okla.) told NBC News.
The bill will most likely restrict the president's ability to admit asylum-seekers via what's called "parole."
"Parole authority, which has existed since the 1950s, allows the government to extend migrants a special status to remain in the United States for a certain period of time," explains The New York Times. "It was designed to be used only in cases of humanitarian need, or if there was a public benefit to allowing a migrant into the country. But administrations have interpreted that guidance in different ways, sometimes ushering in whole groups of migrants under the authority."
State of play: On one hand, Republicans are correct to critique the expansion of executive power in this way. On the other, parole "serves an array of humanitarian purposes, including allowing foreign nationals without visas access to emergency or specialized medical care; allowing beneficiaries of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals and green card applicants to travel internationally; or allowing undocumented spouses of U.S. citizens to regularize their status," notes The Hill.
But Republicans broadly disagree with the "catch and release" method where immigration authorities briefly detain someone who has come to the country, but then grant parole and allow them to have free rein inside the country as they await a court date. They also tend to favor axing group-based parole programs (the Biden administration has, for example, allowed many Afghans to come here following the U.S. pullout there in August 2021) and policies that force detained migrants to stay in facilities on the Mexican, not U.S., side of the border.
The Franceification of California: Teachers at all 23 campuses that comprise the California State University system walked off the job yesterday as part of a five-day strike. Roughly 29,000 employees will be part of this strike, affecting some 460,000 students. The picketers are demanding pay raises of 12 percent, instead of the mere 5 percent offered by university officials in the bargaining room.
"University leaders said the system already spends 75 percent of its operating budget on staff compensation and cannot afford to increase salaries at that level," reports The New York Times. "The California State University Board of Trustees last year approved 6 percent annual tuition increases over five years because system officials said they could not balance their budget otherwise."
Essentially, this is all a continuation of the trend we saw for much of last year: Workers demanding ever-larger paychecks yet remaining broadly oblivious to the economics of the broader institution. Case in point: the autoworker strikes, during which massive numbers of employees demanded that the Big Three carmakers appease them with more money, even though said carmakers are worried about how to make a pivot to electric vehicles and automated vehicles happen, and how to stay competitive in the future.
Scenes from New York:
A bunch of marching Nazis bumping into one another as they try to figure out Metrocards on their way back to Hoboken is a Mel Brooks scene https://t.co/WOqc5ryaB5
— Jordan Zakarin (@jordanzakarin) January 21, 2024
The UAW has asked the Biden administration to raise tariffs on imported cars (from everywhere (MFN), not just China): https://t.co/AfYP9gu88I pic.twitter.com/gJjAhPaJaS
— Scott Lincicome (@scottlincicome) January 22, 2024
Who's behind this?
NBC News reports that residents in New Hampshire are getting robocalls with a deepfake of Biden's voice telling them not to vote in the state's Tuesday primary. pic.twitter.com/xEsumlLamv
— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) January 22, 2024
I still think about this pic.twitter.com/n9TMv649Pt
— Mike Solana (@micsolana) January 22, 2024
Massive Migrant Reduction
7
1
23.01.2024
Immigration
Liz Wolfe | 1.23.2024 9:30 AM
Bipartisan consensus: A deal is emerging in the Senate, supported by both Republicans and Democrats, that would reduce the number of migrants granted asylum and beef up immigration enforcement. Republicans have stipulated that a border-securing package be agreed to for Democrats to get additional Ukraine funding passed. More proof that whenever both parties agree on something, the resulting policy tends to be suboptimal from a libertarian standpoint. "It will be, by far, the most conservative border security bill in four decades," Sen. James Lankford (R–Okla.) told NBC News.
The bill will most likely restrict the president's ability to admit asylum-seekers via what's called "parole."
"Parole authority, which has existed since the 1950s, allows the government to extend migrants a special status to remain in the United States for a certain period of time," explains The New York Times. "It was designed to be used only in cases of humanitarian need, or if there was a public benefit to allowing a migrant into the country. But........
© Reason.com
visit website
login
who are we?
contact us
qosheapp
Toi Staff
Gideon Levy
Belen Fernandez
Andrew Mitrovica
Mort Laitner
Nikkei Editorial
Rami G Khouri
Ali Fathollah-Nejad
