Election 2024
Liz Wolfe | 1.19.2024 9:30 AM
Two terrible choices. Yesterday, Donald Trump indulged in some late-night tweeting. "A PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES MUST HAVE FULL IMMUNITY, WITHOUT WHICH IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM/HER TO PROPERLY FUNCTION," he wrote on his TruthSocial platform, referring to the pending immunity case that a federal appeals court heard arguments for last week and will soon rule on.
"ANY MISTAKE, EVEN IF WELL INTENDED, WOULD BE MET WITH ALMOST CERTAIN INDICTMENT BY THE OPPOSING PARTY AT TERM END. EVEN EVENTS THAT 'CROSS THE LINE' MUST FALL UNDER TOTAL IMMUNITY, OR IT WILL BE YEARS OF TRAUMA TRYING TO DETERMINE GOOD FROM BAD. THERE MUST BE CERTAINTY. EXAMPLE: YOU CAN'T STOP POLICE FROM DOING THE JOB OF STRONG & EFFECTIVE CRIME PREVENTION BECAUSE YOU WANT TO GUARD AGAINST THE OCCASIONAL 'ROGUE COP' OR 'BAD APPLE.' SOMETIMES YOU JUST HAVE TO LIVE WITH 'GREAT BUT SLIGHTLY IMPERFECT.' ALL PRESIDENTS MUST HAVE COMPLETE & TOTAL PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY, OR THE AUTHORITY & DECISIVENESS OF A PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES WILL BE STRIPPED & GONE FOREVER. HOPEFULLY THIS WILL BE AN EASY DECISION. GOD BLESS THE SUPREME COURT!"
(It's likely that the federal appeals court will give Trump a no, and that this will get appealed to the Supreme Court, which will need to rule on this sooner rather than later due to how far into election season we're getting.)
"Reckon for a moment with what it is Trump is actually endorsing here: a literal prescription for strongman-style dictatorship," writes National Review's Jeffrey Blehar. "A thugocracy. The Great Leader and his goons may commit some crimes here and there, but let that slide for the greater good."
Trump also seems to be gesturing toward qualified immunity—the legal doctrine that allows cops to get away with bad behavior if their misconduct was not "clearly established" via a prior court ruling—and acting as if we ought to expand such a thing instead of scrapping it. Contra Trump, our current system allows too many "bad apples" to get away with far too much, and effective law enforcement doesn't have to involve shielding incompetent or malicious government actors from consequences.
Ditto for politicians, regardless of their party. Nobody should be above the law. In a prior era—before their one true love rode down that golden escalator—most Republicans agreed with that.
Don't like Trump? Try … the other guy. Also yesterday, a reporter asked President Joe Biden, "Are the airstrikes in Yemen working?"
"Well, when you say 'working'—are they stopping the Houthis? No. Are they gonna continue? Yes," answered Biden.
I'm sure he didn't intend it as such, but this sort of sums up American foreign policy for the last few decades. Awkward when a president says the quiet part out loud!
Scenes from New York: A midwife on Long Island gave children homeopathic tablets meant to protect against serious viruses—polio, measles, hepatitis—and falsified their records, claiming she had vaccinated them.
Today I filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in the ongoing 14th Amendment Section Three disqualification case. The absurd decision from the Colorado Supreme Court that state officials can block candidates from the ballot on subjective grounds cannot be allowed to stand. https://t.co/mLPQmIq6Db
— Peter Meijer (@RepMeijer) January 18, 2024
Late stage communism is so absurdly comical at times. This entire communist country has fewer amenities than one capitalist cruise ship! https://t.co/OY8TaJQ6Wx pic.twitter.com/LampHYCznk
— Conor Friedersdorf (@conor64) January 18, 2024
Wow, I didn't know Elizabeth Warren was at Davos
pic.twitter.com/q9FwDDx3Z8
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 18, 2024
Bad Apples
10
1
19.01.2024
Election 2024
Liz Wolfe | 1.19.2024 9:30 AM
Two terrible choices. Yesterday, Donald Trump indulged in some late-night tweeting. "A PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES MUST HAVE FULL IMMUNITY, WITHOUT WHICH IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM/HER TO PROPERLY FUNCTION," he wrote on his TruthSocial platform, referring to the pending immunity case that a federal appeals court heard arguments for last week and will soon rule on.
"ANY MISTAKE, EVEN IF WELL INTENDED, WOULD BE MET WITH ALMOST CERTAIN INDICTMENT BY THE OPPOSING PARTY AT TERM END. EVEN EVENTS THAT 'CROSS THE LINE' MUST FALL UNDER TOTAL IMMUNITY, OR IT WILL BE YEARS OF TRAUMA TRYING TO DETERMINE GOOD FROM BAD. THERE MUST BE CERTAINTY. EXAMPLE: YOU CAN'T STOP POLICE FROM DOING THE JOB OF STRONG & EFFECTIVE CRIME PREVENTION BECAUSE YOU WANT TO GUARD AGAINST THE OCCASIONAL 'ROGUE COP' OR 'BAD APPLE.' SOMETIMES YOU JUST HAVE TO LIVE WITH 'GREAT BUT SLIGHTLY IMPERFECT.' ALL PRESIDENTS........
© Reason.com
visit website
login
who are we?
contact us
qosheapp
Toi Staff
Gideon Levy
Belen Fernandez
Andrew Mitrovica
Mort Laitner
Nikkei Editorial
Rami G Khouri
Ali Fathollah-Nejad
