Gift-giving can be a part of a time-honored tradition or ritual or it can be a spontaneous event that arises out of the connection between two people. Branco-Illodo and Heath (2020) noted that there are unwritten rules of reciprocity regarding the exchanging of gifts that spring from ancient traditions. The purposes of gift-giving have traditionally been to regulate bonds with others and to convey status, identity, and control. The person with more status can generally afford to gift others with more valuable gifts, thus symbolizing their greater status. Being the recipient of a luxury gift, even today, can leave the recipient feeling as if they are under the control of the other. The goal of exchanging gifts, however, was the integration of society and the creation of bonds that were evidenced by the exchange of gifts.
Gifts continue to serve as symbols of someone’s feelings towards the recipient. While we may like to imagine that gifts are freely given and are a token of another’s esteem, often gifts are given because of cultural or relational expectations. Whether we are celebrating someone’s birthday, our own anniversary, a religious or cultural event, or individual accomplishments or milestones, gift-giving can feel prescriptive and perfunctory.
Gifts are given as symbols of our sentiments towards a person and problems may arise when there is a mismatch between the sentiment language that the gift giver uses and the sentiment language that the recipient is fluent in using. While gifts are symbols of feelings and emotions that we may not have words for or may have difficulty expressing (Branco-Illodo & Heath, 2020), sometimes our message may not translate as well as hoped when our gift is viewed as off-the-mark by our recipient. For instance, sometimes romantic partners choose gifts that communicate a sentiment that is completely opposite of what was intended. Receiving a robotic vacuum when you hope for something more personal can lead to disappointment and the feeling that your partner just doesn’t get you.
The gifts that people treasure the most are those that provide an experiential element, are unforgettable, or are life-changing (Branco-Illodo & Heath, 2020). The gift isn’t just what was wrapped in paper, it is an embodiment of something more than just a material thing. These are the gifts that reflect the care that someone has for our own experiences — gifting the perfect gift requires an investment of more than just cash by the giver. It’s been described as a sacrifice by the giver of resources, such as time, money, energy, labor, and thought. From the selection of the gift to its wrapping and presentation, the giver has fueled the exchange with sentiment and care. These are the gifts that come from the giver’s heart and are intended to move the heart of the recipient.
Gifts that are chosen perfunctorily, just to “give a gift,” or those that are chosen by someone other than the giver are often disappointing gifts. When the sentiment is lost or overlooked, the gift’s power to please — regardless of its objective value — is minimized. Gifts that are far more costly than a person can easily afford also can create trouble. Feelings of guilt for accepting a too-valuable gift can arise.
There are three other gift types that can be problematic and these all reflect the over-involvement of the giver’s ego:
Other misfires in gifting include these mismatches between what people might want versus what the giver wants to give:
The best gifts are always those that speak to the heart of the recipient in a language that they understand. Listen and observe your intended recipient. Invite them to share their thoughts on what a “perfect gift” would be. Even if you can’t get them exactly what they want, you’ll have an idea of the kind of gift most likely to please. By learning their language, you’ll be in a much better position to let your heart speak to the heart of your recipient.
login
who are we?
contact us
qosheapp
Toi Staff
Gideon Levy
Belen Fernandez
Rami G Khouri
Mort Laitner
Rachel Marsden
Donald Low
Bradley Blankenship
Ali Fathollah-Nejad
Nikkei Editorial
Abbas Juma
Michael Kwet
visit website
