About $3 a week, give or take
You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.
First Reading is a daily newsletter keeping you posted on the travails of Canadian politicos, all curated by the National Post’s own Tristin Hopper. To get an early version sent directly to your inbox, sign up here.
This month has seen the NDP endorse an attempted month-long boycott of all grocery stores owned by Loblaw Companies Ltd., Canada’s largest grocery retailer.
In the House of Commons, NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh said boycotters had been forced into their position “because the prime minister refuses to take on the corporate greed which is driving up prices for Canadians.”
The NDP’s Matthew Green also sponsored an anti-Loblaws petition by boycott organizers seeking, among other things, to “explore the possibility of implementing price controls.”
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Don't have an account? Create Account
A post shared by LoblawsIsOutOfControl (@loblawsisoutofcontrol)
It’s not at all clear if the boycott is having a measurable impact on Loblaw sales. It’s been organized through a Reddit group, Loblaws Is Out of Control, that has 73,000 members — a fraction of the estimated 10 million Canadians who predominantly source their food from a Loblaw subsidiary, including Real Canadian Superstore, No Frills, Shoppers Drug Mart and Loblaws.
But the boycott did spur Loblaw CEO Per Bank to request a private meeting with boycott organizer Emily Johnson.
The boycott is demanding an “immediate 15 per cent price reduction,” as well as price controls across the entire food industry.
But what if they were to take it a step further and demand the complete elimination of Loblaw profits, force them to become a non-profit, and channel any net earnings into reducing prices?
The result would be about $3 in weekly savings for the average consumer.
For roughly the first three months of 2024, Loblaw brought in a total profit of $459 million. But if Loblaw were to spread that $459 million in price cuts across its thousands of retail items, the weekly savings for an average Loblaw customer would come to about $3.20 per week.
This newsletter tackles hot topics with boldness, verve and wit. (Subscriber-exclusive edition on Fridays)
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of Platformed will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
For a family of four, that’s $12.80 — or about $55.64 per month.
A 2023 analysis of the Canadian grocery market by the U.S. Department of Agriculture determined that Loblaw stores represent about 27 per cent of the Canadian retail food market.
As of the most recent count, Canada’s population stands at about 41 million.
This means that the equivalent of about 11 million people are sourcing their meals from a Loblaw retailer.
With net profits currently coming to about $35.3 million per week, it comes to $3.20 once shared out equally among those 11 million shoppers.
And even that figure is generous given that Loblaw derives an increasing share of its profits from non-food businesses, such as the pharmaceuticals sold through its Shoppers Drug Mart chain, alcohol sold through its branded liquor stores or the clothing sold through its Joe Fresh private label.
Shoppers Drug Mart, in particular, saw an eight per cent spike in pharmaceutical and health service sales in the last quarter of 2023. In that same period, “food retail” sales rose by just two per cent.
For some Canadians, $3.20 per savings each week wouldn’t even cover the average annual cost of carbon pricing. According to detailed estimates compiled by the Parliamentary Budget Officer, even after carbon rebates are factored in, residents in certain provinces are already seeing a noticeable hit to their income. In Alberta, for instance, carbon pricing in the current fiscal year is expected to impose net household costs of $1,018.
The reason the savings of a non-profit Loblaw would be so slight is because groceries are famously one of the lowest-margin sectors of the economy, with profits generally representing between one and three per cent of total revenue.
Compare this to the seven per cent profit margin enjoyed by Canadian furniture stores, according to numbers maintained by Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada. Or the 10.8 per cent profit margin you can earn as an alcohol or soft drink wholesaler.
Even as Loblaw enjoys record-high post-COVID profits (their profits rose by a tenth in the first part of this year), their overall profit margin is still running at just 3.5 per cent.
To earn that $459 million in profits for the first quarter of 2024, Loblaw had to bring in total revenue of $13.6 billion. That’s about $1 in profit for every $33 in sales.
If you leave a Real Canadian Superstore with $500 in groceries, this means that just $17 of that bill is likely to enter Loblaw’s ledgers as net profit.
This isn’t to say that Loblaw isn’t a massive company, and that its operations haven’t turned the Weston family into one of Canada’s wealthiest. Canadian grocery margins are also noticeably higher than those in the U.S., a situation that exists in large part due to lack of competition.
But Loblaw remains able to record nine-figure profits each quarter due largely to volume. The company controls about 2,400 stores across all five Canadian time zones.
In most countries, being a non-citizen typically grants you fewer rights as compared to citizens. A Canadian on U.S. soil is not automatically granted the same free speech or gun ownership rights as an American, for instance. But National Post columnist Jamie Sarkonak highlighted several cases in which the precise reverse has been true in Canada: A criminal suspect being explicitly granted lighter treatment because they aren’t a Canadian. Most recently, Rajbir Singh – a 25-year-old in Canada on a visitor’s visa – was found guilty of sexual assault but never convicted because a conviction would have necessitated his deportation (which a judge referred to as “devastating collateral immigration consequences”).
Get all of these insights and more into your inbox by signing up for the First Reading newsletter here.
Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.
Products we couldn’t get enough of this April
Three buzzed-about new beauty products we tried this week.
This unassuming phone stand folds up to credit card size
Celebrating 25 years of Star Wars LEGO
Celebrating Prime Day’s 10th anniversary with savings
365 Bloor Street East, Toronto, Ontario, M4W 3L4
© 2024 National Post, a division of Postmedia Network Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized distribution, transmission or republication strictly prohibited.
This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
You can manage saved articles in your account.
and save up to 100 articles!
You can manage your saved articles in your account and clicking the X located at the bottom right of the article.
login
who are we?
contact us
qosheapp
Toi Staff
Gideon Levy
Belen Fernandez
Rami G Khouri
Mort Laitner
Rachel Marsden
Donald Low
Bradley Blankenship
Ali Fathollah-Nejad
Nikkei Editorial
Abbas Juma
Michael Kwet
visit website
