The chemical company BASF is one of Germany's industrial powerhouses. Operating worldwide, it has around 230 production sites and almost 112,000 employees. A third of them work at its German headquarters in Ludwigshafen, an hour's drive south of Frankfurt am Main. "It is the largest chemical plant in the world," says CEO Martin Brudermüller.
But it is also a plant in trouble. "In 2023, we made money everywhere else in the world, but in Ludwigshafen, we lost €1.5 billion ($1.6 billion)," the BASF CEO reported at an event organized by the Market Economy Foundation in Berlin in March. Rising energy costs and climate change regulations have been the main reasons for the company's difficulties.
The demand for electricity in manufacturing is expected to increase dramatically, but it is unclear where the energy will come from. "We have to shut down our highly efficient gas-fired power plants in Ludwigshafen," lamented Brudermüller, who must find alternatives. "If I have to, I'll even build wind turbines in the North Sea."
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The company has already invested in a wind farm off the Dutch coast. But in January 2024, German grid operators doubled their prices for the use of the power lines. It now costs more to transmit electricity to Ludwigshafen than it does to produce it in the North Sea.
Power grid operators need the money to expand their energy infrastructure. To date, around 14,000 kilometers (8699 miles) of new high-voltage lines have been planned, with thousands more kilometers to be added in the foreseeable future. But billions in state subsidies are no longer available after the Federal Constitutional Court declared the government's budget management to be partially unconstitutional.
Now, the federal government has to cut costs, and consumers and companies are being asked to pay more. The BASF CEO is not the only one who is skeptical. Together with the CEOs of Deutsche Telekom and the energy giant E.on, Brudermüller has written a letter to the government sounding the alarm, demanding that the restructuring costs for the energy transition be financed differently. Especially since grid fees are likely to rise even higher.
For decades, Germany's international competitiveness has been built on a very strong and reliable infrastructure, particularly in the areas of energy, transportation, and telecommunications.
"Infrastructure is a matter of survival," says Brudermüller. If roads, bridges and waterways are in a state of disrepair; if the national rail system remains unreliable, if the expansion of power lines and fiber-optic expansion doesn't go ahead and if digitalization of public administration keeps lagging behind, "then no more companies will come to Germany," Brudermüller predicts.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The federal government is well aware of this criticism. Volker Wissing, Germany's Minister of Digital Affairs and Transport, sees a considerable need for infrastructure improvements in Germany. First and foremost, he sees the need to upgrade the country's transportation systems, above all the railroads and highways. Some 4,500 highway bridges alone are in such a state of disrepair that many of them can only be pulled down and rebuilt.
On 40 rail lines, Deutsche Bahn's tracks and overhead lines are so worn out that they will need to be completely rebuilt, totaling around 4,000 kilometers (8,699 miles) in length. Subsidies from the federal government amount to around €27 billion through 2027. But it is already clear that this will not be enough.
Federal, state, and local governments have nowhere near the resources to address the backlog of renovation and modernization projects. Especially since the so-called debt brake enshrined in the German constitution stipulates that the state may only spend as much money as it earns.
The budget negotiations for 2025 are set to be controversial. The center-left Social Democrats (SPD) and the Greens would like to suspend the country's debt brake again, as was recently done during the crisis caused by the coronavirus pandemic and the war in Ukraine.
Their neoliberal coalition partner, the Free Democrats (FDP) are opposed and demand that all ministries must start making cuts from 2025. Even without major spending on infrastructure, there will be a foreseeable gap of €25 to €30 billion in the budget.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
But the FDP's Volker Wissing remains committed to the debt brake. He believes that if necessary investments can't be covered by the budget, then other options are needed. "We need to mobilize private capital," demanded Wissing. To do this, he wants to set up an infrastructure fund worth billions, in which resources could be collected and pooled for several years.
While Wissing envisages that money to be used primarily for transport infrastructure, FDP leader and Federal Finance Minister Christian Lindner can envision employing the same strategy for other infrastructure as well. In an interview with public ARD television, Lindner pointed out that insurance companies, for example, manage huge sums of money for their customers. "It would be well worth the effort to mobilize this money for the expansion of electricity grids, for example, or for the expansion of hydrogen grids."
But how should such a fund work? After all, private investors will only invest in the long term if they can expect a satisfactory return. Will there be tolls for the autobahns, will there be tolls to cross a bridge? The Ministry of Transport has not yet provided any answers to such specific questions.
The SPD and the Greens would prefer to reform the debt brake to allow infrastructure investment to be financed by borrowing. This idea has gained support from a wide range of economists. There is even growing sympathy for a more flexible interpretation of the debt brake among conservative regional politicians and the business community, where strict fiscal discipline is normally championed.
Michael Hüther, head of the German Economic Institute, which works closely with employers, has proposed setting up a special €500 billion fund for infrastructure and transformation on top of the federal budget. His proposal is modeled on the special fund for the German armed forces, for which the state borrowed €100 billion enshrining it in the constitution with the required two-thirds majority.
This article was originally written in German.
While you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter Berlin Briefing.
login
who are we?
contact us
qosheapp
Toi Staff
Gideon Levy
Belen Fernandez
Andrew Mitrovica
Mort Laitner
Ali Fathollah-Nejad
Rami G Khouri
Nikkei Editorial
visit website
